Article 371 of Constitution of India: Special Provision with Respect to the States of Maharashtra and Gujarat

Share & spread the love

The Constitution of India recognises that historical, geographical, economic and social conditions vary across different regions of the country. While the Constitution largely adopts a uniform federal structure, it also provides for certain special provisions to address regional imbalances and ensure equitable development. Article 371 is one such provision, specifically dealing with the States of Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Article 371 empowers the President of India to assign special responsibilities to the Governors of these States in relation to regional development. The provision aims to address long-standing disparities between different regions within the States and to promote balanced growth, social justice, and administrative fairness.

Background and Constitutional Context

Article 371 falls under Part XXI of the Constitution, titled “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions.” This Part contains provisions designed to meet specific regional needs arising from historical developments, administrative challenges, or socio-economic inequalities.

Maharashtra and Gujarat were formed in 1960 after the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay State on linguistic lines. Following their formation, concerns were raised regarding uneven development among different regions within these States. Regions such as Vidarbha and Marathwada in Maharashtra, and Saurashtra and Kutch in Gujarat, were perceived to be lagging behind in terms of industrial growth, infrastructure, education, and employment opportunities.

Article 371 was introduced to constitutionally recognise these concerns and to provide a structured mechanism for addressing them.

Text and Scope of Article 371

Article 371 authorises the President to issue orders providing special responsibilities to the Governor of Maharashtra or Gujarat. These responsibilities relate to specific developmental and administrative matters and operate notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in the Constitution.

The provision does not alter the basic federal structure or legislative powers of the States. Instead, it creates an additional constitutional mechanism to promote equitable regional development within the States.

Special Responsibilities of the Governor

Under Article 371, the President may assign the Governor special responsibility in three key areas.

Establishment of Separate Development Boards

One of the most significant features of Article 371 is the provision for the establishment of separate development boards for identified regions.

In Maharashtra, these regions include:

  • Vidarbha
  • Marathwada
  • The rest of Maharashtra

In Gujarat, the regions include:

  • Saurashtra
  • Kutch
  • The rest of Gujarat

These development boards are tasked with focusing on region-specific developmental needs. The purpose is to ensure that historically disadvantaged areas receive targeted attention in planning and execution of development schemes.

A constitutional safeguard is built into this mechanism through the requirement that an annual report on the working of each development board must be placed before the State Legislative Assembly. This promotes transparency, accountability, and legislative oversight.

Equitable Allocation of Developmental Funds

Article 371 also empowers the Governor to ensure equitable allocation of funds for developmental expenditure among the various regions of the State.

This does not mean equal distribution in a mechanical sense. The Constitution uses the term equitable, indicating a fair distribution based on regional needs, levels of backwardness, and developmental priorities. At the same time, such allocation must remain subject to the requirements of the State as a whole, ensuring that overall State interests are not compromised.

This provision seeks to prevent concentration of public investment in already developed regions and to correct structural imbalances in resource distribution.

Facilities for Education, Training and Employment

The third area of special responsibility relates to:

  • Technical education
  • Vocational training
  • Employment opportunities under State Government services

Article 371 requires equitable arrangements to ensure that residents of all regions receive adequate access to these opportunities. This provision addresses concerns relating to regional exclusion in educational institutions, skill development programmes, and public employment.

By focusing on education and employment, Article 371 directly links regional development with long-term capacity building and social mobility.

Role of the President and Governor

The operation of Article 371 depends on Presidential orders. The President exercises this power based on constitutional advice and administrative considerations. Once such an order is issued, the Governor assumes a special role distinct from routine executive functions.

While the Governor normally acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, Article 371 allows the Governor to discharge specific responsibilities independently in the identified areas. This special role is intended to act as a constitutional safeguard against regional neglect.

However, this does not convert the Governor into a parallel executive authority. The Governor’s role remains limited to the responsibilities expressly conferred by the Presidential order.

Constitutional Significance of Article 371

Article 371 holds importance for several reasons.

First, it reflects the flexible nature of Indian federalism, where uniform governance is balanced with region-specific solutions.

Second, it recognises that administrative equality does not always result in substantive equality. By addressing historical and structural disadvantages, the provision seeks to achieve real equality among regions.

Third, Article 371 strengthens democratic accountability by mandating legislative scrutiny of development board functioning through annual reports.

Fourth, it reinforces the idea that regional aspirations can be addressed within the constitutional framework, reducing the risk of political alienation or separatist demands.

Judicial Interpretation and Practice

Unlike some other special provisions, Article 371 has seen limited direct judicial interpretation. Courts have generally treated it as an enabling provision that allows executive action within constitutional limits.

Judicial scrutiny has focused on ensuring that actions taken under Article 371 do not violate:

The judiciary has consistently upheld the validity of region-specific measures when they are based on reasonable classification and legitimate developmental objectives.

Comparison with Other Special Provisions

Article 371 should be read alongside related provisions such as Articles 371A to 371J, which grant special status or safeguards to other States including Nagaland, Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, and several northeastern States.

Unlike provisions that protect customary laws or tribal autonomy, Article 371 for Maharashtra and Gujarat is primarily development-oriented. It does not grant political autonomy or legislative exemptions but focuses on balanced economic and social growth.

This distinction highlights the diverse ways in which the Constitution addresses regional diversity.

Conclusion

Article 371 represents a thoughtful constitutional response to regional disparities within the States of Maharashtra and Gujarat. By empowering the President and Governor to focus on regional development, equitable fund distribution, and access to education and employment, the provision seeks to ensure inclusive growth.


Attention all law students and lawyers!

Are you tired of missing out on internship, job opportunities and law notes?

Well, fear no more! With 2+ lakhs students already on board, you don't want to be left behind. Be a part of the biggest legal community around!

Join our WhatsApp Groups (Click Here) and Telegram Channel (Click Here) and get instant notifications.

Aishwarya Agrawal
Aishwarya Agrawal

Aishwarya is a gold medalist from Hidayatullah National Law University (2015-2020). She has worked at prestigious organisations, including Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and the Office of Kapil Sibal.

Articles: 5701

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NALSAR IICA LLM 2026