Mediation Agreement: Meaning and Requirements Under the Mediation Act, 2023

A mediation agreement forms the legal foundation for referring a dispute to mediation. It records the parties’ intention to attempt an amicable resolution with the assistance of a neutral mediator instead of immediately pursuing adjudication. 

Section 4 of the Mediation Act, 2023 explains its meaning, permissible forms and writing requirements. A properly drafted agreement reduces uncertainty and helps parties begin mediation through a clear and mutually accepted process.

Add LawBhoomi as your preferred source on Google.

Add Now →

Meaning of a Mediation Agreement

A mediation agreement is an agreement between parties to submit all or certain disputes to mediation. It may cover disputes that have already arisen or disputes that may arise in the future from a defined legal relationship.

The legal relationship may be contractual, such as a commercial agreement, service arrangement, partnership deed, employment contract, construction contract or supply agreement. It may also be connected with another relationship from which a dispute capable of mediation arises.

The central feature of a mediation agreement is the parties’ consent to use mediation as a method of dispute resolution. The agreement does not itself settle the dispute. It only establishes that the parties have agreed to attempt mediation if a covered dispute arises.

A mediation agreement may therefore be understood as a procedural agreement. It determines the method through which parties will initially attempt to resolve their differences. The mediator does not impose a binding decision. The parties retain control over whether a settlement will ultimately be reached and on what terms.

Mediation Agreement Under Section 4 of the Mediation Act, 2023

Section 4 of the Mediation Act, 2023 provides the statutory basis for mediation agreements in India. It recognises an agreement under which parties submit to mediation all or certain disputes that have arisen or may arise between them.

The provision gives parties considerable flexibility. A mediation agreement may be created before any dispute exists or after a dispute has already developed. It may cover every dispute connected with a relationship or only particular categories of disputes.

Section 4 also recognises different ways in which the agreement may be recorded. It may be included as a clause in a larger contract or executed as a separate agreement. However, the statutory requirement that it must be in writing remains important.

The provision further recognises modern commercial communication. A written mediation agreement may be established through signed documents, electronic communications, an exchange of pleadings or incorporation of a mediation clause by reference.

What is Purpose of a Mediation Agreement?

A mediation agreement provides clarity regarding the parties’ chosen dispute resolution process. It encourages parties to attempt a cooperative settlement before allowing the dispute to develop into prolonged litigation or arbitration.

Its principal purposes include:

• Recording consent to mediation: The agreement provides evidence that the parties have accepted mediation as a process for resolving defined disputes.
• Identifying the scope of disputes: It may clarify whether all disputes or only particular disputes must be referred to mediation.
• Creating a procedural framework: The clause may specify the institution, mediator appointment procedure, language, venue, online process and division of costs.
• Reducing preliminary disagreements: A clear clause can prevent later arguments about whether mediation was agreed upon or how it should be commenced.
• Supporting preservation of relationships: Mediation may be particularly useful where parties have continuing commercial, employment, family, partnership or community relationships.

A mediation agreement is therefore more than a standard clause added at the end of a contract. Its wording may directly affect whether the mediation process can begin smoothly when a dispute arises.

What are the Essential Requirements of a Valid Mediation Agreement?

Section 4 primarily regulates the meaning and written form of a mediation agreement. Its validity must also be considered in the broader context of general principles governing agreements and the nature of mediation.

The following requirements are significant.

Agreement Between the Parties

There must be an agreement between the parties to submit disputes to mediation. A unilateral statement by one party is ordinarily insufficient because mediation is founded upon mutual participation and consent.

The parties’ intention must be identifiable from the document, correspondence or other recognised record. The agreement need not use elaborate legal expressions, but it should show that mediation was consciously selected as a method of dispute resolution.

Words such as “may consider mediation” or “may discuss the possibility of mediation” may not communicate the same level of commitment as a clause stating that the parties “shall attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation”.

Clear and definite language is therefore preferable.

Disputes Must Be Connected With a Defined Relationship

A mediation agreement should relate to disputes arising between the parties from an identified relationship. The relationship may be contractual or otherwise.

For example, a clause may cover disputes arising out of or relating to a supply contract. It may also cover questions concerning the interpretation, performance, breach, termination or validity of that contract.

The expression “all disputes arising out of or in connection with this agreement” is commonly used because it provides a broad scope. Where the parties intend to mediate only limited matters, the clause should identify those matters accurately.

Existing or Future Disputes May Be Covered

A mediation agreement may concern an existing dispute or a future dispute.

An agreement concerning future disputes is usually included in the original contract. At the time of signing, no disagreement may exist, but the parties agree that disputes arising later will be referred to mediation.

An agreement concerning an existing dispute is generally executed after differences have already arisen. It may identify the dispute, the parties, the mediator or mediation institution and the procedure to be followed.

This flexibility allows mediation to be selected at different stages of a legal relationship.

Agreement Must Be in Writing

The most important formal requirement under Section 4 is that a mediation agreement must be in writing.

An oral understanding, even where informally accepted, may create uncertainty regarding its existence, terms and scope. The writing requirement provides a reliable record of the parties’ intention and assists in resolving later disagreements about whether mediation was agreed upon.

The Act adopts a broad understanding of writing. A single formally signed contract is not the only method through which the requirement may be satisfied.

Forms of a Written Mediation Agreement

Section 4 recognises several forms in which a mediation agreement may be treated as being in writing.

Document Signed by the Parties

The clearest form is a document signed by all parties. This may be:

• A principal contract containing a mediation clause;
• A separate mediation agreement;
• An addendum added to an existing contract;
• A settlement-process agreement signed after a dispute arises; or
• A joint request referring an existing dispute to mediation.

Signatures provide direct evidence of consent. Where companies, partnerships or other organisations are parties, the persons signing should have proper authority to bind the respective entities.

Electronic signatures may also be relevant where documents are executed electronically in accordance with applicable law.

Exchange of Communications

A mediation agreement may be established through an exchange of communications that provides a record of the agreement. Such communications may include letters, emails and other forms of electronic communication.

For example, one party may propose that an existing dispute be referred to mediation, and the other party may accept the proposal through email. Taken together, the exchange may establish a written mediation agreement.

The communications should clearly show agreement on mediation. Mere negotiations, unanswered proposals or preliminary discussions may not establish concluded consent.

The recognition of electronic communications reflects modern commercial practice, where agreements are frequently negotiated and confirmed without a single physical document.

Exchange of Statements of Claim and Defence

The existence of a mediation agreement may also be established through an exchange of statements of claim and defence where one party alleges that such an agreement exists and the other party does not deny it.

This method is relevant when formal proceedings or structured claims have already begun. If one party relies on the mediation agreement and the other party accepts or does not dispute its existence, the written requirement may be satisfied through the exchanged statements.

However, an express denial may create a dispute regarding the existence or applicability of the agreement. Accurate pleading and documentation are therefore important.

Incorporation by Reference

A contract may refer to another document that contains a mediation clause. Such a reference can constitute a mediation agreement when the contract is in writing and the reference makes the mediation clause part of the contract.

This method is known as incorporation by reference.

It may arise where a contract incorporates standard terms, institutional rules, tender conditions, industry documents or another agreement containing a mediation clause. A general reference to another document may not always be sufficient. The wording should indicate that the relevant terms, including the mediation clause, are incorporated into the contract.

The incorporated document should also be identifiable and accessible to the parties.

Mediation Clause and Separate Mediation Agreement

A mediation agreement may take the form of either a clause within a larger contract or a separate agreement.

Mediation Clause in a Contract

A mediation clause is generally included at the contract-drafting stage. It applies if a dispute arises later.

Such a clause may state that disputes arising out of or connected with the contract must first be referred to mediation. It may form part of a multi-tier dispute resolution clause requiring negotiation, followed by mediation and then arbitration or litigation.

The advantage of an advance clause is that the dispute resolution process is chosen when relations between the parties are cooperative.

Separate Mediation Agreement

A separate mediation agreement is usually entered into after a dispute has arisen, although parties may also execute one in advance.

It may contain more detailed procedural terms because the nature of the dispute is already known. The parties may identify the issues, appoint a mediator, select an institution, decide the venue or online platform and determine how costs will be shared.

Both forms are recognised, provided that the legal requirements are satisfied.

What are the Contents of a Valid Mediation Agreement?

Section 4 does not require every procedural detail to be included. Nevertheless, a carefully drafted agreement should address matters that may otherwise cause confusion.

Identification of the Parties

The full names, addresses and legal status of the parties should be accurately stated. Where an entity is involved, its registered name and authorised representative should be identified.

Scope of the Agreement

The clause should specify the disputes covered by mediation. Broad wording may cover disputes relating to interpretation, performance, payment, breach, validity and termination.

Where exclusions are intended, they should be clearly stated.

Mandatory or Voluntary Language

The wording should show whether mediation is a required first step or merely an available option. Expressions such as “shall refer” generally indicate a stronger obligation than “may refer”.

However, an obligation to commence or participate in mediation does not ordinarily mean that parties can be forced to accept a settlement.

Method of Appointing the Mediator

The agreement may allow the parties to jointly appoint a mediator. It may also refer the appointment to a mediation institution or another agreed authority if the parties cannot agree.

Institutional or Independent Mediation

Parties may choose mediation administered by a recognised mediation service provider or an independently arranged process. Institutional mediation generally provides established rules, administrative support and appointment mechanisms.

Place, Language and Mode of Mediation

The agreement may state the place and language of mediation. It may also provide for physical, online or hybrid mediation.

These matters are particularly important in transactions involving parties situated in different States or countries.

Costs of Mediation

The clause may specify whether costs will be shared equally or allocated in another manner. It may also cover the mediator’s fee, institutional charges, venue expenses and professional costs.

Subsequent Proceedings

The agreement should explain what happens if mediation does not result in settlement. Depending on the arrangement, the dispute may proceed to arbitration, litigation or another agreed mechanism.

A well-drafted multi-tier clause should avoid uncertainty about timelines and the transition between different stages.

Mediation Agreement and Mediated Settlement Agreement

A mediation agreement must not be confused with a mediated settlement agreement.

A mediation agreement is made before mediation begins or while the parties are deciding to enter mediation. Its purpose is to refer disputes to the mediation process.

A mediated settlement agreement is the written agreement reached as a result of mediation. It contains the terms on which some or all disputes have been resolved. It must be signed by the parties and authenticated by the mediator in the manner recognised under the Mediation Act, 2023.

The distinction may be summarised as follows:

This distinction is essential because the two documents perform completely different legal functions.

Effect of an Unclear Mediation Agreement

Poorly drafted mediation clauses may create procedural disputes instead of preventing them. Problems commonly arise where:

• The clause does not clearly identify the disputes covered;
• The named mediation institution does not exist or is incorrectly described;
• The clause uses uncertain expressions regarding whether mediation is mandatory;
• The appointment procedure is incomplete;
• The clause conflicts with the arbitration or jurisdiction clause;
• No procedure is stated for moving to the next stage after failed mediation; or
• The agreement refers to unavailable rules or documents.

Courts and tribunals may examine the wording, contractual context and conduct of the parties when questions arise regarding the existence or scope of the agreement. Clear drafting reduces the possibility of conflicting interpretations.

Disputes That Cannot Be Mediated

The existence of a mediation agreement does not automatically make every dispute suitable for mediation.

Section 6 of the Mediation Act, 2023, read with the First Schedule, identifies disputes or matters that are not fit for mediation. The statutory exclusions must therefore be considered while drafting and applying a mediation agreement.

Parties cannot make a legally excluded dispute mediable merely by inserting it in a contract. The subject matter must be capable of lawful settlement through mediation.

Where a clause covers both mediable and non-mediable matters, the possibility of separating the eligible disputes may depend on the nature of the controversy and applicable law.

Model Mediation Clause

A basic mediation clause may be drafted in the following manner:

Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, including its interpretation, performance, breach, validity or termination, shall first be referred to mediation. The parties shall mutually appoint a mediator and participate in the mediation proceedings in good faith. If the dispute is not settled through mediation within the agreed period, either party may pursue the remedies available under the dispute resolution clause of this agreement.

This is only a general model. The clause may require modification based on the nature of the transaction, applicable institutional rules, the relationship between the parties and the dispute resolution mechanism that follows mediation.

Practical Drafting Considerations

A mediation agreement should be reviewed as carefully as any other important contractual term. The following practices improve certainty:

• The intention to refer disputes to mediation should be expressed in direct language.
• The disputes and legal relationship covered by the clause should be identifiable.
• The mediation clause should be consistent with arbitration, jurisdiction and governing-law provisions.
• The method of appointing the mediator should be workable.
• The clause should provide a solution where the parties cannot agree on the mediator.
• Any institutional rules incorporated into the contract should be correctly named.
• A reasonable period may be fixed for attempting mediation before further proceedings begin.
• The possibility of urgent interim relief should be addressed where necessary.
• Electronic and online mediation may be expressly permitted.
• The clause should state what follows if mediation ends without settlement.

These measures do not remove every possibility of disagreement, but they provide a reliable structure for commencing and conducting mediation.

Conclusion

A mediation agreement is the legal expression of the parties’ decision to resolve existing or future disputes through mediation. Section 4 of the Mediation Act, 2023 recognises mediation clauses, separate agreements, electronic communications, exchanges of pleadings and incorporation by reference. The agreement must be in writing and should clearly identify the parties’ intention and the disputes covered.

Careful drafting is important because an uncertain clause may delay the dispute resolution process. A clear mediation agreement supports informed participation, preserves procedural certainty and creates a practical foundation for amicable settlement. It must also be distinguished from a mediated settlement agreement, which records the final terms reached after successful mediation.