Debt Restructuring vs. Bankruptcy: Which Is Better Legally?

Share & spread the love

Financial distress is a situation that no individual or company wishes to face, yet it is a reality for many in today’s dynamic and uncertain economy. When an individual or business is unable to meet its debt obligations, they are often faced with two major options for resolving the situation: debt restructuring or bankruptcy. These two mechanisms aim to provide relief from financial obligations but differ significantly in terms of their legal processes, implications, and outcomes. Understanding the legal nuances of each is crucial for businesses and individuals navigating financial difficulty.

What is Debt Restructuring?

Debt restructuring is a negotiated process where a debtor and creditor mutually agree to modify the terms of an existing debt. This could include changing repayment schedules, reducing the interest rate, converting debt into equity, or even offering a partial debt write-off. The goal of debt restructuring is to avoid a situation where the debtor is unable to meet their obligations, while allowing the creditor to recover some of their dues over time.

In India, debt restructuring is a voluntary arrangement and can occur either informally, through direct negotiation between the debtor and creditor, or formally under various legal frameworks. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued guidelines to facilitate restructuring for financial institutions. Additionally, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, provides mechanisms like the Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP), specifically for MSMEs, offering an alternative form of debt restructuring.

Debt restructuring is ideal for businesses that are still viable but are facing temporary cash flow issues. It allows companies to stay operational while making it easier to meet their financial obligations over a longer period.

What is Bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a legal declaration that an individual or business is unable to repay its outstanding debts. In India, bankruptcy is governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. When a debtor applies for bankruptcy, they are seeking formal protection from creditors, and the process is overseen by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for companies or Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) for individuals.

The bankruptcy process begins when a debtor or their creditors file for insolvency proceedings under the IBC. Upon the admission of the case, the Insolvency Professional is appointed to take charge of the debtor’s assets and operations. A moratorium is imposed on all legal proceedings against the debtor, and creditors are given a defined timeline to approve a resolution plan. If a resolution cannot be reached, the company or individual may enter liquidation, where their assets are sold off to repay creditors.

Unlike debt restructuring, bankruptcy is a formal, court-driven process that may lead to liquidation if no resolution is achieved. While bankruptcy offers legal protection and ensures a clear process for debt resolution, it can be a more drastic measure that comes with severe consequences for the debtor’s credit rating and reputation.

Key Differences: Debt Restructuring vs. Bankruptcy

AspectDebt RestructuringBankruptcy
NatureVoluntary and negotiatedLegal and court-driven
Control Over OperationsDebtor retains control over assets and operationsControl often shifts to Insolvency Professional
CostLess expensive and time-consumingCostly and time-consuming
Credit ImpactAffected, but the debtor can recoverSignificant long-term impact on credit score
Public PerceptionLess damaging, preserves reputationNegative stigma; seen as financial failure
OutcomeModified debt terms, business survivalPotential liquidation or restructuring under supervision
Legal FrameworkRBI, IBC (Pre-pack)IBC, 2016 (Corporate and Individual Insolvency)

When is Debt Restructuring Better?

Debt restructuring can be the better legal option when:

  1. The business is still viable: Debt restructuring is a suitable option for businesses that are financially distressed but can recover with some changes to their debt terms. For example, a retail business struggling with cash flow issues can restructure its loan to extend repayment periods, reducing the pressure on daily operations.
  2. Creditors are cooperative: Debt restructuring requires the cooperation of creditors. It is a negotiated settlement, meaning that all parties need to be willing to work together to find a solution. If the creditors agree to reduce the interest rate or offer an extension, the debtor can continue to operate without the need for formal legal proceedings.
  3. The debtor wants to maintain control: Under debt restructuring, the debtor retains control of their assets and operations. This is critical for businesses that wish to continue their operations and work toward recovery without the disruption that comes with bankruptcy.
  4. The need to avoid liquidation: Debt restructuring helps avoid liquidation, which may lead to the sale of business assets. Instead, debtors have the opportunity to reorganise and return to profitability.

Example: A hospitality chain facing a decline in revenue may negotiate with its creditors to reschedule debt payments. By extending the repayment period and reducing interest rates, the company can continue to operate, preserve jobs, and return to profitability without having to undergo bankruptcy proceedings.

When is Bankruptcy the Better Option?

Bankruptcy may be the better option when:

  1. The business is insolvent beyond recovery: When a company is overwhelmed by debts it cannot repay and has no viable way to continue operating, bankruptcy is a necessary legal process. Bankruptcy provides a clear path to either restructure the business under court supervision or liquidate its assets and distribute the proceeds to creditors.
  2. The creditors are unwilling to cooperate: If creditors are unwilling to offer concessions or work out a repayment plan, the debtor may have no choice but to enter bankruptcy proceedings. Bankruptcy allows the debtor to take advantage of a moratorium that halts all creditor actions and legal proceedings.
  3. Time is of the essence: Bankruptcy provides a time-bound process. The IBC mandates a resolution process within 180 days, which can be extended to 330 days. This allows businesses to get closure quickly, while providing creditors an efficient process to recover dues.
  4. There is a need for liquidation: If a business or individual is beyond recovery, liquidation may be the only viable option. Bankruptcy provides a legal framework to sell off assets and repay creditors.

Example: A manufacturing company unable to recover from years of losses may find itself in a position where bankruptcy is the only option. In this case, creditors may seek liquidation of the company’s assets to recover their dues.

Legal Framework in India: Debt Restructuring vs. Bankruptcy

In India, both debt restructuring and bankruptcy fall under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.

Debt Restructuring under RBI Guidelines

The RBI Prudential Framework (2019) and Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) provide avenues for formal debt restructuring. The PPIRP, in particular, allows MSMEs to restructure their debts without triggering a full-scale insolvency process, offering a quicker and more flexible resolution.

Bankruptcy under IBC

When informal restructuring fails, the IBC provides a statutory framework for insolvency resolution. The IBC covers both corporate insolvency (for companies) and individual insolvency (for individuals), allowing for an orderly resolution or liquidation process. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is the adjudicating authority for corporate insolvency, while the Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) handle individual insolvency cases.

Conclusion: Which Is Legally Better?

The choice between debt restructuring and bankruptcy depends on the specific circumstances of the debtor.

  • Debt restructuring is legally better when the debtor has a viable business model but is facing temporary financial difficulties. It allows for flexible negotiations, keeps the business operational, and preserves the debtor’s reputation.
  • Bankruptcy is legally better when the debtor is insolvent beyond recovery, creditors are unwilling to cooperate, or there is a need for a formal legal resolution. Bankruptcy ensures a structured process, provides legal protection, and can lead to an orderly liquidation of assets.

Ultimately, legal advice is crucial to navigate these options. An insolvency professional or legal consultant can help determine the best path forward based on the debtor’s financial position, creditor dynamics, and business viability.


Attention all law students!

Are you tired of missing out on internship, job opportunities and law notes?

Well, fear no more! With 1+ lakhs students already on board, you don't want to be left behind. Be a part of the biggest legal community around!

Join our WhatsApp Groups (Click Here) and Telegram Channel (Click Here) and get instant notifications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LawBhoomi
Upgrad