Complaints and Remedies under Right to Education Act, 2009

Key Takeaways

• The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, commonly known as the RTE Act, provides a specific grievance redressal mechanism when the educational rights of a child protected by the Act are violated.
• Section 32 permits any person having a grievance relating to a child’s rights under the RTE Act to make a written complaint to the local authority having jurisdiction.
• The local authority is required to decide an RTE complaint within three months after giving the concerned parties a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
• A person dissatisfied with the decision of the local authority can appeal to the State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (SCPCR) or the authority constituted under Section 31(3), where applicable.
• Complaints may arise from issues such as denial of admission, unlawful screening, collection of capitation fee, discrimination, physical punishment, mental harassment or denial of statutory educational entitlements.
• NCPCR and State Commissions can inquire into complaints concerning children’s educational rights and exercise statutory powers available under the child-rights framework.
• Apart from the statutory complaint procedure, appropriate cases involving violation of fundamental or legal rights may also reach constitutional courts through writ jurisdiction.

What Is a Complaint under the Right to Education Act?

A complaint under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 is a grievance concerning violation of a right given to a child under the Act.

The RTE Act gives children between the ages of six and fourteen years a statutory right to free and compulsory elementary education. It came into force on 1 April 2010 and gives effect to the constitutional guarantee of elementary education under Article 21A.

Add LawBhoomi as your preferred source on Google.

Add Now →

The Act places obligations on governments, local authorities, schools and teachers and contains safeguards relating to admission, school functioning, treatment of children and elementary education.

When these statutory protections are violated, the Act does not merely recognise the right. It also provides a mechanism through which grievances can be raised, examined and remedied.

Sections 31 and 32 are especially important for this purpose.

What Does Section 32 of the RTE Act Provide?

Section 32 of the RTE Act specifically deals with redressal of grievances.

Find the latest legal internship opportunities, updated daily.

Find Internships →

Under Section 32(1), any person having a grievance relating to the right of a child under the Act may make a written complaint to the local authority having jurisdiction.

This provision is important because the complaint is not restricted only to the child personally. The expression used in the Act is “any person” having a grievance relating to the right of a child. Therefore, depending upon the circumstances, a parent, guardian or another concerned person may raise the grievance.

After receiving the complaint, the local authority must decide the matter within three months. Before taking the decision, the parties concerned must be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

The basic mechanism can therefore be understood as:

RTE violation → Written complaint before local authority → Hearing → Decision within three months → Appeal, if required

Who Can File a Complaint under the RTE Act?

Section 32 uses broad language and permits any person having a grievance relating to a child’s rights under the RTE Act to submit a complaint.

A complaint may therefore commonly be initiated by:

• A parent or guardian: A parent or guardian may complain where the child’s admission, educational entitlement, safety or another statutory protection has allegedly been violated.
• A person concerned about denial of an RTE entitlement: A complaint may relate to denial of education or another right available to a particular child under the Act.
• A person raising a grievance about unlawful school practices: This may include complaints relating to capitation fees, screening procedures, discrimination or prohibited treatment of children.
• Another concerned person: The provision is broad enough to cover another person who has a grievance relating to a child’s statutory rights under the Act.

The important consideration is that the grievance must relate to a right recognised under the RTE Act.

Explore practical law courses to build career-ready legal skills.

Explore Courses →

Where Should an RTE Complaint Be Filed?

The first statutory forum under Section 32 is the local authority having jurisdiction.

The identity of the local authority may depend upon the applicable State framework. The RTE Act defines local authorities and assigns several responsibilities to them, while States may prescribe administrative arrangements for receiving and deciding complaints.

Therefore, the exact officer or body before which a complaint is submitted may differ between States and local administrative areas.

Before filing a complaint, the applicable State RTE Rules, education department notifications or grievance mechanisms may therefore need to be examined to identify the competent local authority.

What Should a Written Complaint Contain?

Although specific procedural requirements may depend upon the applicable State Rules or grievance system, a properly prepared complaint would ordinarily contain relevant information such as:

• Details of the complainant: The complaint should contain sufficient information to identify and contact the person making the grievance.
• Details of the affected child: The child’s name, age, school and relevant educational details may be necessary.
• Details of the school or authority: The institution or public authority against which the grievance arises should be clearly identified.
• Description of the violation: The facts should clearly explain what happened and how the child’s rights under the RTE Act were allegedly violated.
• Relevant dates and documents: Admission forms, school notices, receipts, correspondence and other supporting material may help establish the grievance.
• Relief sought: The complaint may indicate the corrective action required, such as consideration of admission, withdrawal of an unlawful demand or intervention by the education authority.

The complaint should remain factual and clearly identify how the child’s rights under the RTE Act have allegedly been affected.

How Long Does the Authority Have to Decide an RTE Complaint?

Section 32(2) provides a specific time limit.

The local authority must decide the complaint within three months from its receipt.

Before deciding the matter, the authority must provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the parties concerned.

Explore practical law courses to build career-ready legal skills.

Explore Courses →

The hearing requirement reflects the principles of natural justice. An authority deciding a dispute affecting the rights or interests of a child, parent, school or other concerned party should follow a fair procedure and provide an opportunity for relevant parties to present their case.

The principle of audi alteram partem, meaning that the other side should also be heard, is an important part of fair administrative decision-making.

What Happens If the Local Authority Rejects the Complaint?

An adverse decision of the local authority is not necessarily the end of the grievance process.

Under Section 32(3), any person aggrieved by the decision of the local authority may prefer an appeal to:

• the State Commission for Protection of Child Rights, or
• the authority constituted under Section 31(3), where applicable.

Section 32(4) further provides that the appeal is to be decided by the State Commission or the prescribed authority in accordance with the framework contemplated under Section 31.

Therefore, the RTE Act broadly creates a two-level statutory grievance framework:

1. Complaint before the local authority
2. Appeal before the SCPCR or authority constituted under Section 31(3)

This allows a person dissatisfied with the local authority’s decision to obtain further examination of the grievance.

What Is the Role of NCPCR and SCPCR under the RTE Act?

Section 31 gives the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) and the State Commissions for Protection of Child Rights (SCPCRs) an important role in protecting educational rights.

Under Section 31(1), these Commissions perform additional functions under the RTE Act, including:

• examining and reviewing safeguards relating to rights provided under the Act;
• recommending measures for their effective implementation;
• inquiring into complaints relating to a child’s right to free and compulsory education; and
• taking necessary steps available under the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005.

Their role therefore extends beyond dealing with individual disputes. The Commissions also monitor whether statutory protections relating to children’s educational rights are being implemented effectively.

This supervisory role is particularly important because the right to education is connected with the broader constitutional protection of children’s access to elementary education.

What Happens If a State Does Not Have an SCPCR?

The RTE Act provides an alternative arrangement.

Under Section 31(3), where a State Commission for Protection of Child Rights has not been constituted, the appropriate Government may constitute another authority for performing the functions specified under Section 31.

Such an authority performs the functions that would otherwise fall within the relevant RTE responsibilities of the State Commission.

Accordingly, the absence of an SCPCR does not by itself remove the statutory grievance mechanism.

What Powers Do Child Rights Commissions Have While Inquiring into Complaints?

The RTE Act connects the powers of NCPCR and SCPCR with those available under the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005.

Section 14 of the CPCR Act gives the Commission powers similar to those of a civil court while conducting specified inquiries.

These include powers relating to:

• Summoning persons: The Commission may summon persons and enforce their attendance where necessary for an inquiry.
• Examination on oath: Persons appearing before the Commission may be examined on oath.
• Production of documents: The Commission may require discovery and production of documents relevant to the inquiry.
• Evidence through affidavits: Evidence may be received through affidavits where permitted.
• Public records: Relevant public records or copies of such records may be requisitioned from offices or authorities.
• Examination of witnesses or documents: Commissions may be issued where examination of witnesses or documents is required.

These powers enable child-rights bodies to examine grievances through a structured statutory inquiry rather than treating complaints merely as informal representations.

What Remedies Can Be Granted in an RTE Complaint?

The precise remedy depends upon the nature of the violation, the authority hearing the matter and the applicable legal framework.

Possible outcomes may include directions or recommendations intended to restore compliance with the child’s educational rights.

Remedial action may concern matters such as:

• admission wrongfully denied;
• unlawful fees or admission practices;
• discriminatory treatment;
• violation of RTE admission requirements;
• physical punishment or mental harassment;
• failure to provide statutory educational entitlements;
• deficiencies requiring corrective action by educational authorities; or
• misconduct requiring departmental or other proceedings.

The Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act also provides a broader remedial framework. Following an inquiry, the Commission may recommend initiation of appropriate proceedings and, in suitable cases, recommend interim relief or approach the Supreme Court or High Court for necessary directions, orders or writs.

What Types of RTE Violations Can Lead to Complaints?

Several violations under the RTE Act may become the basis of grievance proceedings.

Denial of Free and Compulsory Elementary Education

The central purpose of the RTE Act is to secure free and compulsory elementary education for children within the statutory age group.

A grievance may arise where a child entitled to the protection of the Act is unlawfully prevented from accessing elementary education or is required to bear expenses prohibited by the statutory framework.

Unlawful Capitation Fee

Section 13 prohibits a school or person from collecting capitation fee as part of the admission process.

A capitation fee broadly refers to an amount demanded or collected beyond the fee permitted or notified by the school in accordance with law.

Contravention of the prohibition concerning capitation fee can attract a fine extending to ten times the capitation fee charged.

This makes the prohibition more than a general administrative requirement. The Act itself attaches a monetary consequence to the unlawful collection of capitation fee.

Screening During Admission

Section 13 also prohibits subjecting a child or the child’s parents or guardians to an unlawful screening procedure for admission.

A prohibited screening process generally involves selecting or testing children or their parents for admission in circumstances where such screening is not permitted under the Act.

Violation may attract a fine extending to:

• ₹25,000 for the first contravention, and
• ₹50,000 for each subsequent contravention.

These statutory penalties are separate from the broader grievance mechanism available for protecting the child’s educational rights.

Physical Punishment and Mental Harassment

Section 17 provides that no child shall be subjected to physical punishment or mental harassment.

A person contravening this provision is liable to disciplinary action under the service rules applicable to that person.

The prohibition forms part of the wider legal protection against corporal punishment in schools. Physical punishment by a teacher or school authority may also raise issues under other child-protection and criminal laws depending upon the nature and seriousness of the conduct.

Thus, an incident of physical punishment may involve more than one form of legal remedy.

Violation of the 25% Admission Requirement

Section 12(1)(c) contains an important obligation applicable to specified schools concerning admission of children belonging to weaker sections and disadvantaged groups.

Covered schools are required to admit eligible children at the entry level to the extent prescribed under the provision, subject to the statutory framework and applicable Rules.

Complaints may arise where eligible children are improperly denied admission or where the admission process is inconsistent with the requirements of the RTE Act.

Can a Complaint Be Filed Directly with NCPCR?

NCPCR operates an online complaint management system known as e-Baal Nidan.

The system permits complaints concerning child-rights issues to be registered electronically. The complaint system seeks information relating to the complainant, affected child, State, district, complaint category and facts of the grievance. Supporting documents may also be submitted.

NCPCR also has statutory authority under the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 to inquire into complaints concerning deprivation and violation of child rights and non-implementation of laws intended for the protection and development of children.

However, where the grievance specifically falls within Section 32 of the RTE Act, the statutory complaint mechanism beginning with the competent local authority remains important.

Can Courts Be Approached for Violation of RTE Rights?

The statutory grievance mechanism under Sections 31 and 32 does not eliminate constitutional remedies available in appropriate cases.

Article 21A of the Constitution recognises the right to free and compulsory education for children within the constitutional age group in the manner determined by law.

Where governmental or public authorities violate statutory or fundamental rights, an appropriate matter may reach a High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32, subject to the principles governing constitutional remedies.

Remedy under Article 226

Article 226 of the Constitution empowers High Courts to issue appropriate writs, directions and orders for enforcement of fundamental rights as well as other legal rights.

Depending upon the circumstances, a writ remedy may become relevant where an educational or governmental authority has failed to discharge a statutory duty, acted unlawfully or violated a legally enforceable right.

Remedy under Article 32

Article 32 of the Constitution of India enables the Supreme Court to issue appropriate writs, orders or directions for enforcement of fundamental rights.

Since Article 21A forms part of the Fundamental Rights chapter of the Constitution, serious violations raising constitutional questions may potentially involve Article 32, depending upon the circumstances and maintainability of the proceedings.

However, where an effective statutory grievance mechanism exists, constitutional courts may consider whether that mechanism should ordinarily be used first.

The position depends upon the facts, urgency, nature of violation and the recognised principles concerning the availability of an alternative remedy.

Is the School Management Committee a Complaint Authority?

The RTE Act gives School Management Committees (SMCs) important responsibilities in relation to school monitoring and development, particularly in schools to which the relevant provisions apply.

However, the statutory grievance authority expressly identified under Section 32 is the local authority having jurisdiction.

An SMC may become relevant at the school level where a matter concerns monitoring, school functioning or resolution of issues falling within its responsibilities, but it should not be confused with the formal grievance mechanism created by Section 32.

Therefore, approaching an SMC and filing a statutory complaint before the competent local authority are not necessarily the same legal process.

What Documents Can Help Support an RTE Complaint?

The strength of a complaint generally depends upon the clarity of the facts and available evidence.

Relevant documents may include:

• Admission records: Admission forms, applications, acknowledgements or allotment documents may help establish the circumstances relating to an admission dispute.
• Written refusal of admission: A written communication refusing admission may directly establish the decision being challenged.
• Fee receipts: These may be relevant where unlawful fees or capitation charges are alleged.
• School notices or circulars: Documents issued by the school may demonstrate the policy or requirement giving rise to the complaint.
• Communication with school authorities: Emails, letters or written representations may establish earlier attempts to resolve the matter.
• Government or RTE admission records: These may be particularly important in disputes involving statutory admission entitlements.
• Medical records: Where physical punishment or injury is alleged, relevant medical documents may support the factual allegations.
• Copies of earlier complaints: Representations made before school officials, education departments or local authorities may help establish the history of the grievance.
• Orders already passed: Any previous decision by an education authority should ordinarily be included if further review or appeal is being sought.

Only relevant material should ordinarily accompany the complaint so that the authority can clearly identify the alleged violation.

What Is the Difference Between a Complaint and an Appeal under the RTE Act?

A complaint under Section 32(1) is the first grievance presented to the local authority regarding violation of a child’s rights under the Act.

An appeal under Section 32(3) challenges the decision made by that local authority.

Therefore:

This distinction is important because the appellate authority ordinarily examines a decision that has already been made at the local level.

Why Is the RTE Grievance Redressal Mechanism Important?

Educational rights can lose practical value if there is no accessible system for enforcing them.

Sections 31 and 32 attempt to create such a system by combining:

• local grievance resolution;
• statutory monitoring by child-rights institutions;
• an appellate mechanism;
• powers of inquiry;
• specific penalties for certain violations; and
• access to broader constitutional remedies where legally appropriate.

The requirement that parties receive a hearing also reflects the wider importance of natural justice in administrative decision-making.

The grievance redressal framework is particularly important because disputes involving school admission and elementary education often require timely resolution. A delayed remedy may adversely affect an entire academic year of a child.

Conclusion

The Right to Education Act, 2009 creates a specific legal framework for complaints and remedies relating to the educational rights of children. Section 32 allows any person having a grievance concerning a child’s rights under the Act to submit a written complaint to the competent local authority. The authority must provide the parties an opportunity of being heard and decide the matter within three months.

A person aggrieved by that decision may approach the State Commission for Protection of Child Rights or the authority constituted under Section 31(3). NCPCR and State Commissions also have wider responsibilities to monitor RTE safeguards, investigate complaints and take appropriate steps for protection of children’s educational rights.

The appropriate remedy ultimately depends upon the nature of the violation. Denial of admission, capitation fees, unlawful screening, discriminatory practices, physical punishment, mental harassment and violation of statutory admission rights may involve different provisions and consequences.

Where statutory remedies are insufficient or constitutional rights are directly affected, the broader framework of constitutional remedies and writ jurisdiction may also become relevant. The RTE grievance mechanism therefore forms part of a wider legal framework intended to ensure that the right to elementary education is capable of practical enforcement rather than remaining only a statutory promise.