Partnership Property under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932

Partnership property means all property, rights and interests belonging to a partnership firm under Section 14 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. It includes property contributed by partners, assets acquired for the firm, property purchased with firm funds and the goodwill of the business. Whether a particular asset belongs to the firm depends mainly on the partnership agreement, the source of funds and the intention and conduct of the partners.

Meaning of Partnership Property

The expression “partnership property” refers to the property of the firm. It is also commonly described as partnership assets, joint stock, common stock or the joint estate of the partners.

Add LawBhoomi as your preferred source on Google.

Add Now →

Partnership property includes every property, right and interest to which the firm is entitled. It may include:

• Land and buildings used and owned by the firm
• Machinery, furniture and business equipment
• Money, stock and movable assets
• Benefits arising from contracts
• Leasehold and tenancy rights
• Rights under licences and quotas
• Insurance policies purchased with firm funds
• Intellectual and commercial rights
• Goodwill of the business

A partnership firm is generally not treated as a separate legal person distinct from its partners. Therefore, strictly speaking, the firm does not own property in the same manner as a company. The property of the firm is the joint estate of all the partners.

However, partnership property is treated as separate from the personal property of individual partners for practical and legal purposes. No partner can claim exclusive ownership over any particular asset of the firm during the continuance of the partnership.

In Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa, AIR 1966 SC 1300, the Supreme Court explained that when a partner brings money or property into the partnership as capital, it ceases to remain the exclusive property of that partner. It becomes a trading asset of the firm in which all partners have an interest according to their agreed shares.

What Does Section 14 of the Partnership Act Provide?

Section 14 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 defines the property of the firm. It provides that, subject to the contract between the partners, the property of the firm includes:

• Property, rights and interests originally brought into the stock of the firm
• Property acquired by purchase or otherwise by or for the firm
• Property acquired for the purposes and in the course of the business of the firm
• Goodwill of the business

Section 14 further creates a presumption regarding property purchased with the money of the firm. Unless a contrary intention appears, property and rights acquired with firm money are presumed to have been acquired for the firm.

The words “subject to contract between the partners” are significant. They show that the agreement and intention of the partners play a central role in deciding whether an asset forms part of the partnership property.

What Are the Main Types of Partnership Property?

Partnership property under Section 14 can broadly be divided into three categories.

Property Originally Brought into the Common Stock

Property contributed by a partner at the time of constitution of the partnership may become property of the firm.

A partner may contribute:

• Money
• Land
• A building
• Machinery
• Vehicles
• Stock or goods
• Intellectual property
• Other business assets

Once the property is brought into the common stock as capital, the contributing partner loses the right to treat it as exclusive personal property. The partner acquires an interest in the entire partnership estate rather than ownership over a particular asset.

In Sunil Siddharthbhai v. Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1986 SC 368, the Supreme Court observed that when a partner introduces a personal asset into the partnership as capital, the partner’s exclusive interest is reduced to a shared interest with the other partners.

Similarly, in Sujan Suresh Sawant v. Dr. Kamlakant Shantaram Desai, AIR 2004 Bom 446, the Bombay High Court observed that a personal asset contributed to the partnership becomes subject to the rights of the other partners.

The contribution of immovable property to the common stock does not necessarily amount to a sale by the partner to the firm. In CIT v. Hind Construction Ltd., the Supreme Court recognised that bringing property into the partnership as capital is different from an ordinary sale.

Property Acquired by or for the Firm

Property purchased or otherwise acquired by the firm in the course of its business is partnership property.

This category may include:

• A building purchased for the firm
• Machinery acquired for manufacturing
• Shares purchased with partnership money
• Vehicles purchased for business operations
• A lease renewed for the benefit of the firm
• Business licences and contractual rights
• Insurance policies paid for from firm funds

In Debi Prasad v. Jairam, AIR 1952 Punj 284, shares purchased in the name of one partner with the money of the firm were treated as partnership property.

Similarly, where life insurance policies of partners are maintained through premiums paid from firm funds, such policies may be regarded as assets of the firm, depending on the surrounding circumstances and agreement.

In Broadway Centre v. Gopaldas Bagri, AIR 2002 Cal 78, a partner purchased property in a court auction and later introduced it into the partnership under a registered partnership deed. The other partners had also contributed funds towards its purchase as share capital. The Calcutta High Court treated the property as belonging to the firm.

Personal Property of a Partner Used by the Firm

The personal property of a partner does not automatically become partnership property merely because it is used for the business of the firm.

This is one of the most important principles concerning partnership assets.

A partner may allow the firm to use:

• A personally owned building
• A vehicle
• Machinery
• Furniture
• A licence
• A leasehold property
• Office premises

Mere use by the firm does not by itself transfer ownership to the partnership. There must be an express or implied agreement showing that the property was intended to become an asset of the firm.

In Boda Narayan Murthy & Sons v. Valluri Venkata Suguna, AIR 1978 AP 257, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that property belonging to a person does not become partnership property merely because it is used for the firm’s business. It becomes partnership property only when there is an express or implied agreement to that effect.

The same principle was applied in Noor Mohammed Mir v. Qadir Mir, where the court held that the property of a partner does not become firm property simply because it is made available for partnership use.

In ARM Group Enterprises Ltd. v. Waldorf Restaurant, (2003) 6 SCC 423, the Supreme Court also recognised that individually owned property does not become partnership property merely because it is used by the partnership. The intention and agreement between the partners remain decisive.

What Is the Main Test for Identifying Partnership Property?

The main test is the intention of the partners.

The court examines whether the partners intended the property to become part of the common stock of the firm. Such intention may be gathered from:

• The partnership deed
• The manner in which the property was acquired
• The source of money used for its purchase
• Entries in the books of account
• Treatment of the asset in balance sheets
• Conduct of the partners
• Use of the property
• Statements made by the partners
• Surrounding business circumstances

In Arjun Kanaji Tankar v. Shantaram Kanaji Tankar, the Supreme Court emphasised that whether a property belongs to the firm depends primarily on the agreement between the partners.

Similarly, in Lachmandas v. Gulab Devi, AIR 1936 All 270, the intention gathered from the partnership agreement was treated as the principal test.

Therefore, the name in which the property stands is not always conclusive. Property may stand in the name of one partner but still belong beneficially to the firm. Conversely, an asset may be extensively used by the firm but continue to remain the separate property of a partner.

What Is the Presumption When Firm Money Is Used?

Section 14 creates a rebuttable presumption that property acquired with money belonging to the firm is acquired for the firm.

This means that when partnership funds are used to purchase an asset, the asset will ordinarily be treated as partnership property unless evidence shows a contrary intention.

However, the source of money is not the only consideration. The entire transaction must be examined.

For example, where money is advanced by the firm to a partner as a loan and the partner purchases an asset personally, the asset may remain the partner’s separate property. The partner may simply become indebted to the firm.

In Gumanmal v. Papurbai, it was observed that land purchased with partnership funds does not necessarily become partnership property in every situation. The purpose of the purchase and the surrounding evidence must also be considered.

Thus, the use of firm funds creates a strong presumption, but that presumption can be displaced by the agreement, accounts or conduct of the partners.

Can Immovable Property Be Introduced into a Partnership?

A partner may bring land or other immovable property into the common stock of the firm as capital.

The introduction of immovable property into the partnership does not necessarily require a sale deed between the partner and the firm. The transaction is not ordinarily treated as a sale because the firm is not a separate legal person from the partners.

In Ram Sahai Mal v. Biseshwar Nath Pal, AIR 1963 Pat 221, the court observed that a written or registered document is not always necessary for a partner to contribute immovable property to the firm as capital. The absence of mutation was also not regarded as decisive.

In Kallepally Krishna Raju v. Commissioner and Inspector-General of Registration and Stamps, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that property could be brought into the partnership stock without a formal document containing words of transfer. A partnership deed recording such contribution could not automatically be treated as a sale deed or gift deed.

Nevertheless, clear drafting is essential where immovable property is involved. The deed should specify the nature of the asset, its value, the extent of the partner’s contribution and whether ownership is intended to pass into the common stock.

What Rights Do Partners Have in Partnership Property?

During the existence of the partnership, no partner has an exclusive right over any particular asset of the firm.

A partner’s right is generally limited to:

• Participating in the profits of the business
• Having partnership property applied for firm purposes
• Receiving an account of the firm’s assets and liabilities
• Receiving a proportionate share in the surplus after dissolution and settlement of accounts

In S.V. Chandra Pandian v. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar, (1993) 1 SCC 589, the Supreme Court held that the entire property contributed by partners or acquired during the business constitutes property of the firm. During the partnership, partners have an undefined interest in the assets. A definite proportionate share arises only after dissolution and settlement of accounts.

In Syndicate Bank v. R.S.R. Engineering Works, (2003) 6 SCC 265, the Supreme Court clarified that partnership is not a species of joint tenancy and that the principle of survivorship does not ordinarily apply to the beneficial interest of partners in partnership assets.

How Must Partnership Property Be Used?

Section 15 of the Indian Partnership Act provides that, subject to the agreement between the partners, the property of the firm shall be held and used exclusively for the purposes of the business.

A partner cannot ordinarily use partnership property for private purposes without the consent of the other partners.

For example, a partner cannot:

• Use firm money for personal investment
• Occupy firm premises for an unrelated personal venture
• Transfer a partnership asset for personal benefit
• Use the firm’s licence or business opportunity for an individual enterprise
• Earn secret profits from firm property

In Reddi Veerraju v. Chittori Lakshminarasamma, the court observed that the rights of partners as joint owners are restricted by Sections 14 and 15. Partnership property must be used for partnership purposes and not for individual purposes.

What Happens If a Partner Earns Private Profit?

Section 16 requires a partner to account to the firm for personal profits obtained from:

• A transaction of the firm
• Use of partnership property
• Use of the firm’s business connection
• Use of the firm’s name
• Use of the firm’s goodwill

A partner stands in a fiduciary relationship with the other partners. The partner must act honestly, disclose material information and avoid making secret profits at the expense of the firm.

Where a partner acquires a benefit in breach of the duty of good faith, the benefit is treated as having been acquired for the partnership. The partner must account for it to the firm.

A renewed lease obtained by a partner in an individual name may, in appropriate circumstances, belong to the firm if the renewal arose from an existing partnership lease or business opportunity.

Is Goodwill Part of Partnership Property?

Goodwill is expressly included in the property of the firm under Section 14.

Goodwill means the commercial value arising from the reputation, customer connection, location, trade name and business standing of the firm. It represents the possibility that existing customers will continue to deal with the business.

Goodwill is an intangible asset, but it may have substantial financial value.

In Khushal Khemgar Shah v. Khorshed Banu Dadiba Boatwalla, AIR 1970 SC 1147, the Supreme Court recognised goodwill as part of the property of the firm.

However, goodwill and other partnership assets are legally distinct. A clause excluding a partner’s share in goodwill does not necessarily exclude that partner’s rights in all other assets.

In Shri Chemical Corporation v. Miraben Profulbhai Contractor, AIR 2001 Guj 171, the Gujarat High Court held that exclusion of goodwill under a partnership deed did not automatically amount to exclusion of rights in other assets of the firm.

What Happens to Partnership Property after Dissolution?

After dissolution, the property of the firm is applied towards settlement of its debts and liabilities.

Section 46 gives every partner or legal representative the right to have the property of the firm applied in payment of the firm’s debts and liabilities. The surplus remaining after such payment is distributed among the partners according to their rights.

Under Section 48, the assets of the firm are generally applied in the following order:

1. Payment of debts owed to third parties
2. Repayment of advances made by partners
3. Repayment of capital contributed by partners
4. Distribution of the residue among partners in their profit-sharing ratio

A partner does not receive a specific asset merely because that partner originally introduced it into the firm. Once contributed to the common stock, the property becomes part of the partnership estate, subject to any contrary agreement.

Conclusion

Partnership property under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 includes assets contributed by partners, property acquired for the firm, rights purchased with firm funds and the goodwill of the business. The partnership agreement and intention of the partners are the most important factors in determining ownership. Mere use of personal property by the firm does not make it partnership property. During the partnership, no partner can claim exclusive ownership over a specific asset, and firm property must be used only for business purposes. After dissolution, the assets are applied towards liabilities and the remaining surplus is distributed among the partners according to their legal rights.