Environmental Governance in India

Environmental governance in India refers to the legal, institutional and administrative system through which environmental policies are framed, implemented and enforced. It involves the Union Government, State Governments, regulatory authorities, courts, tribunals, local bodies, industries and the public. 

The system seeks to balance economic development with pollution control, conservation of natural resources, protection of biodiversity and the constitutional right to live in a healthy environment.

Add LawBhoomi as your preferred source on Google.

Add Now →

Meaning of Environmental Governance

Environmental governance is broader than environmental protection. Environmental protection generally refers to measures taken to prevent pollution and conserve natural resources. Environmental governance includes the entire process through which environmental decisions are made and implemented.

It covers the creation of environmental laws, allocation of powers among institutions, granting of permissions, monitoring of industries, enforcement of standards, settlement of environmental disputes and participation of affected communities.

Good environmental governance requires transparency, accountability, scientific decision-making, public participation and access to justice. It also requires coordination among institutions dealing with forests, wildlife, water, air pollution, waste management, climate change, land use and industrial development.

In India, environmental governance operates through a combination of constitutional provisions, parliamentary legislation, delegated legislation, administrative authorities and judicial decisions.

Evolution of Environmental Governance in India

Environmental regulation in India initially developed through laws dealing with forests, public health, fisheries, factories and municipal administration. These laws did not create a complete environmental governance system. Their focus was generally limited to the management of particular resources or prevention of specific forms of harm.

A major change occurred after the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held at Stockholm in 1972. The conference influenced the development of modern environmental policy and legislation in India. Parliament subsequently enacted the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

The Constitution was amended in 1976 through the Forty-Second Amendment. Article 48A was added to the Directive Principles of State Policy, while Article 51A(g) introduced a fundamental duty relating to environmental protection.

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 was enacted to control air pollution. After the Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 was passed as an umbrella legislation.

The judiciary also played a major role in strengthening environmental governance. Through public interest litigation, the Supreme Court expanded Article 21 and recognised environmental protection as an essential part of the right to life.

The establishment of the National Green Tribunal in 2010 added a specialised environmental adjudicatory body to the governance structure.

Constitutional Framework for Environmental Governance

The Constitution of India does not originally contain a separate fundamental right to a clean environment. However, constitutional provisions have been interpreted and developed to create a strong foundation for environmental governance.

Article 21 And The Right To A Healthy Environment

Article 21 guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. The Supreme Court has interpreted the right to life broadly. It includes the right to live with human dignity and access to conditions necessary for a meaningful life.

A polluted environment can affect health, livelihood, food, water and human dignity. Therefore, the right to clean air, safe drinking water and a healthy environment has been recognised as part of Article 21.

In Subhash Kumar v State of Bihar, the Supreme Court observed that the right to life includes the right to enjoy pollution-free water and air. This interpretation transformed environmental protection from a policy concern into a constitutional obligation.

Article 48A

Article 48A directs the State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard the forests and wildlife of the country. It is a Directive Principle of State Policy.

Although Directive Principles are not directly enforceable in the same manner as fundamental rights, they guide the State in making laws and policies. Courts also rely on Article 48A while interpreting environmental legislation.

Article 51A(g)

Article 51A(g) states that it is the fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures.

This provision shows that environmental protection is not only a governmental responsibility. Citizens, businesses and institutions also have a role in maintaining ecological balance.

Articles 32 And 226

Articles 32 and 226 provide constitutional remedies before the Supreme Court and High Courts. These provisions have enabled individuals, organisations and public-spirited persons to file environmental public interest litigation.

Courts have used writ jurisdiction to stop polluting activities, order restoration, appoint expert committees and direct public authorities to enforce environmental laws.

Distribution Of Legislative Powers

Environmental matters are distributed across different entries in the Union, State and Concurrent Lists. Subjects such as forests and protection of wild animals and birds are included in the Concurrent List. Both Parliament and State Legislatures may make laws on these matters.

Water, public health, agriculture, land and local government involve significant State responsibility. International environmental agreements may also be implemented by Parliament under Article 253.

This distribution creates a system of cooperative environmental federalism. However, it may also produce jurisdictional overlap and coordination difficulties.

Legislative Framework for Environmental Governance

India has several environmental laws dealing with pollution control, natural resource conservation and environmental liability.

Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974

The Water Act was enacted to prevent and control water pollution and maintain or restore the wholesomeness of water. It established the Central Pollution Control Board and State Pollution Control Boards.

Industries generally require the consent of the concerned State Pollution Control Board before establishing or operating activities that may discharge sewage or trade effluent. The Boards may inspect premises, collect samples and issue directions.

Air (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1981

The Air Act provides for the prevention, control and abatement of air pollution. It empowers State Governments to declare air pollution control areas and regulates industrial emissions within such areas.

The Central and State Pollution Control Boards perform regulatory functions under the Act. Industries may be required to obtain consent and comply with prescribed emission standards.

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 is an umbrella legislation enacted for the protection and improvement of the environment. It grants broad powers to the Central Government.

The Central Government may prescribe environmental standards, regulate industrial locations, restrict certain activities, inspect premises and issue binding directions. Such directions may include the closure of an industry or stoppage of electricity and water supply.

Several important rules and notifications have been issued under this Act. These deal with environmental impact assessment, hazardous substances, coastal regulation, noise pollution and different categories of waste.

Forest Conservation Law

The forest conservation framework regulates the use of forest land for non-forest purposes. Prior approval of the Central Government is generally required before forest land is diverted for activities such as mining, industry, roads or infrastructure.

This process is important because diversion of forest land may affect biodiversity, wildlife habitats, water systems and forest-dependent communities.

Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 provides for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants. It also governs protected areas such as national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, conservation reserves and community reserves.

Environmental governance relating to wildlife involves the Central Government, State Governments, wildlife authorities, forest departments and specialised bodies.

Biological Diversity Act, 2002

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 seeks to conserve biological diversity, promote sustainable use and ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from biological resources and associated knowledge.

It creates a three-level institutional structure consisting of the National Biodiversity Authority, State Biodiversity Boards and Biodiversity Management Committees at the local level.

Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991

The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 provides immediate relief to persons affected by accidents involving hazardous substances. Owners handling hazardous substances must obtain insurance coverage as required by law.

National Green Tribunal Act, 2010

The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 established the National Green Tribunal for effective and expeditious disposal of environmental cases.

The Tribunal may hear civil cases involving substantial questions relating to the environment under the enactments listed in its Schedule. It may order relief, compensation and restitution of damaged property or environment.

Institutional Framework for Environmental Governance

Environmental governance in India is carried out by several institutions at the national, State and local levels.

Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change is the principal Union Ministry responsible for environmental and forest-related policies and programmes.

Its work includes environmental clearances, forest conservation, wildlife protection, biodiversity conservation, pollution control policy, climate change and implementation of international environmental commitments.

The Ministry also frames rules, notifications and standards under environmental legislation and coordinates with State Governments and specialised authorities.

Central Pollution Control Board

The Central Pollution Control Board is a statutory body constituted under the Water Act. It also performs functions under the Air Act and environmental rules.

Its principal functions include advising the Central Government, coordinating the activities of State Boards, providing technical assistance, conducting research, collecting environmental data and laying down standards.

The CPCB also prepares guidelines and monitors pollution control programmes at the national level.

State Pollution Control Boards

State Pollution Control Boards are the principal pollution control authorities at the State level. They grant or refuse consent to industries, conduct inspections, collect samples and monitor compliance.

They may issue directions against industries violating pollution control laws. Their effectiveness depends on adequate staff, technical capacity, laboratories, data systems and institutional independence.

Local Authorities

Municipal corporations, municipalities, panchayats and other local authorities have important environmental responsibilities. These include waste collection, sanitation, sewage management, drainage, local water bodies and public health.

The success of national environmental policies often depends on implementation by local bodies. Limited financial resources and technical capacity, however, frequently affect local environmental governance.

Specialised Environmental Authorities

Different bodies deal with specific environmental concerns. These include the National Biodiversity Authority, State Biodiversity Boards, National Board for Wildlife, State Boards for Wildlife, Central Zoo Authority and National Tiger Conservation Authority.

The Commission for Air Quality Management also performs specialised functions concerning air quality management in the National Capital Region and adjoining areas.

Environmental Impact Assessment And Clearance

Environmental Impact Assessment is a decision-making process used to identify and evaluate the likely environmental effects of a proposed project before approval is granted.

The EIA Notification, 2006 classifies projects according to their nature, size and potential environmental impact. Certain projects are appraised at the Central level, while others are considered by State-level authorities.

The process may include screening, scoping, preparation of an EIA report, public consultation, appraisal and a final decision. Environmental clearance may be granted subject to conditions designed to reduce environmental harm.

Public hearings allow affected persons to raise concerns about pollution, displacement, livelihood, water use, forest loss and health risks. Their effectiveness depends on timely access to information and meaningful consideration of objections.

Weak baseline data, poor-quality reports, conflicts of interest, inadequate public consultation and limited post-clearance monitoring can reduce the effectiveness of the EIA process.

Role Of The Judiciary

The Supreme Court and High Courts have played a transformative role in environmental governance. Judicial intervention became particularly important where regulatory authorities failed to enforce environmental laws.

In Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court addressed the ecological consequences of limestone quarrying. The case demonstrated that harmful economic activity may be restricted to protect the environment.

In M.C. Mehta v Union of India, the Supreme Court dealt with several major environmental issues, including industrial pollution, vehicular pollution and the protection of the Ganga and Taj Mahal. The Oleum Gas Leak decision also developed the principle of absolute liability for hazardous industries.

In Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v Union of India, the Court recognised the precautionary principle and polluter pays principle as essential features of environmental law.

In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India, polluting industries were held responsible for the cost of remedial measures.

The continuing mandamus technique has also been used in environmental cases. Under this method, courts keep proceedings pending and issue directions over time to ensure continuing compliance.

Role Of The National Green Tribunal

The National Green Tribunal provides a specialised forum for environmental disputes. It consists of judicial and expert members, allowing legal questions to be examined with technical knowledge.

The Tribunal is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure. It is guided by the principles of natural justice. It is also required to apply sustainable development, the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle while deciding cases.

The NGT has addressed matters relating to air and water pollution, solid waste, mining, forest diversion, wetlands, industrial accidents and environmental compensation.

Its establishment has improved access to specialised environmental justice. However, effective environmental governance also depends on timely implementation of Tribunal orders by administrative authorities.

Principles Governing Environmental Decision-Making

Environmental institutions and courts rely on several important principles.

• The principle of sustainable development requires development to meet present needs without destroying the ecological foundations required by future generations.
• The precautionary principle allows preventive action where an activity creates a threat of serious or irreversible harm, even when complete scientific certainty is unavailable.
• The polluter pays principle places the financial burden of pollution control, compensation and environmental restoration on the person responsible for the harm.
• The public trust doctrine treats resources such as rivers, forests, lakes and seashores as resources held by the State in trust for the public.
• Inter-generational equity requires natural resources to be protected for future generations. These principles guide the interpretation of laws, project approvals and environmental remedies.

Public Participation And Access To Information

Public participation improves environmental decision-making by bringing local knowledge, livelihood concerns and social impacts into the regulatory process.

Participation may occur through public hearings, representations before authorities, local biodiversity bodies, public interest litigation and proceedings before the NGT.

The Right to Information Act, 2005 also supports environmental governance by enabling access to official records, inspection reports, clearances and compliance information.

However, participation must be meaningful rather than symbolic. Notices should be accessible, documents should be available in understandable forms and authorities should properly consider the concerns raised by affected communities.

Conclusion

Environmental governance in India is supported by constitutional duties, specialised legislation, regulatory institutions and an active environmental judiciary. The framework has developed considerably since the 1970s and now covers pollution control, conservation, impact assessment, liability and environmental justice. 

Its main weakness lies not in the absence of laws but in inconsistent implementation. Stronger institutions, transparent decisions, scientific monitoring, meaningful public participation and effective enforcement are necessary to ensure that development remains environmentally sustainable.