Suspension and Cancellation of Medical Registration in India
Contents
hide
Key Takeaways
- Medical registration gives a qualified medical practitioner the legal authority to practise medicine in India. Section 34 of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 restricts medical practice and specified professional functions to persons enrolled in the State Register or National Register.
- A doctor’s registration may be removed temporarily or permanently when professional or ethical misconduct is established through disciplinary proceedings.
- The National Medical Commission Act, 2019 gives State Medical Councils an important role in disciplinary action, while the Ethics and Medical Registration Board (EMRB) exercises regulatory and appellate functions at the national level.
- Under the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, an appropriate Medical Council may remove a doctor’s name from the medical register either permanently or for a specified period after finding professional misconduct.
- A medical practitioner must ordinarily be given an opportunity of hearing before disciplinary action is taken. This requirement reflects the principles of natural justice.
- Temporary removal is different from permanent cancellation. Where removal is ordered for a limited period, the Medical Council may direct restoration of the doctor’s name after that period expires.
- The National Medical Commission Registered Medical Practitioner (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 2023 were notified in August 2023 but were subsequently kept in abeyance. The 2002 professional-conduct framework therefore continues to remain particularly relevant.
What Is Medical Registration in India?
Medical registration is the formal recognition that permits a qualified medical practitioner to practise medicine in India in accordance with law.
The National Medical Commission Act, 2019 provides for the National Register of licensed medical practitioners. Section 31 requires the Ethics and Medical Registration Board to maintain the National Register containing prescribed information relating to licensed medical practitioners.
Add LawBhoomi as your preferred source on Google.
The Registration of Medical Practitioners and Licence to Practice Medicine Regulations, 2023 further regulate registration and licensing of medical practitioners. These regulations were notified on 10 May 2023.
Registration is not merely an administrative formality. It has direct legal consequences.
Section 34 of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 provides that a person who is not enrolled in the State Register or National Register cannot ordinarily:
- Practise medicine as a qualified medical practitioner: Valid registration is fundamental to lawful medical practice in India.
- Hold specified professional offices: A person without the required registration cannot hold an office intended to be occupied by a physician or surgeon.
- Issue specified medical certificates: Registration is required for signing or authenticating medical or fitness certificates where the law requires certification by a duly qualified medical practitioner.
- Give specified medical evidence: Registration is also relevant for exercising certain professional functions connected with medical evidence.
Therefore, suspension or removal from the medical register can directly affect a practitioner’s legal ability to continue medical practice.
Explore LawBhoomi's free law library for students and lawyers.
What Is Suspension of Medical Registration?
Suspension of medical registration generally refers to a temporary restriction on a doctor’s right to practise medicine arising from disciplinary action.
The terminology used in the operative ethics regulations is principally removal from the register for a specified period rather than simply “suspension”.
Regulation 8.2 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 allows the appropriate Medical Council, after finding a medical practitioner guilty of professional misconduct, to direct removal of the practitioner’s name from the register either:
- altogether; or
- for a specified period.
A removal for a specified period operates in substance as a temporary loss of registration rights.
For example, if registration is removed for six months, the practitioner would ordinarily be unable to exercise the professional rights dependent upon registration during that period.
What Is Cancellation of Medical Registration?
Cancellation of medical registration commonly refers to permanent removal of the doctor’s name from the relevant medical register.
The 2002 Ethics Regulations use the expression “removal altogether” from the register. Permanent removal is a significantly more serious disciplinary consequence because it is not limited to a predetermined period.
Cancellation or permanent removal should therefore be distinguished from:
Discover the latest legal jobs and career openings.
- a warning or other disciplinary punishment;
- temporary restriction on a particular procedure;
- removal for a specific period; and
- administrative correction of registration records.
Permanent removal ordinarily follows a disciplinary finding and cannot be treated as an automatic consequence of every complaint against a doctor.
What Is the Difference Between Suspension and Cancellation of Medical Registration?
The main difference lies in the duration and effect of the disciplinary action.
Suspension or Temporary Removal
Temporary removal prevents the medical practitioner from exercising registration-based professional rights for the period specified by the disciplinary authority.
Once the period expires, Regulation 8.3 permits the appropriate Council to direct restoration of the practitioner’s name to the register.
The purpose is therefore to impose a time-bound disciplinary consequence rather than permanently terminate the practitioner’s registered status.
Permanent Cancellation or Removal
Permanent removal does not contain a predetermined expiry period. The doctor’s name is removed altogether from the register in accordance with the disciplinary decision.
The consequences are therefore substantially more serious and long-lasting.
Which Law Governs Suspension and Cancellation of Medical Registration?
The principal statutory framework is the National Medical Commission Act, 2019.
Section 27 assigns several functions to the Ethics and Medical Registration Board. These include:
Find the latest legal internship opportunities, updated daily.
- maintaining National Registers of licensed medical practitioners;
- regulating professional conduct and promoting medical ethics;
- ensuring compliance with professional and ethical standards through State Medical Councils where those Councils have disciplinary powers;
- maintaining interaction with State Medical Councils; and
- exercising appellate jurisdiction over actions taken by State Medical Councils under Section 30.
Professional misconduct and disciplinary proceedings are also presently understood with reference to the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, subject to the present NMC statutory framework.
Are the NMC Professional Conduct Regulations, 2023 Currently in Force?
The National Medical Commission notified the Registered Medical Practitioner (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 2023 in August 2023.
However, the NMC subsequently issued an amendment notification dated 23 August 2023 keeping those regulations in abeyance.
Consequently, the 2002 professional conduct and ethics framework remains particularly important when examining misconduct and disciplinary punishment.
This distinction is important because the 2023 regulations should not be treated as though their substantive professional-conduct provisions are presently fully operative.
Who Can Take Disciplinary Action Against a Doctor?
The disciplinary framework operates through both State Medical Councils and the National Medical Commission structure.
State Medical Councils
Section 30 of the National Medical Commission Act recognises disciplinary action by State Medical Councils where the concerned State law gives such councils authority to act in cases involving professional or ethical misconduct.
The State Medical Council must exercise such disciplinary powers in accordance with the applicable regulations and guidelines under the NMC framework.
Complaints involving negligence, unethical behaviour and professional misconduct may therefore result in proceedings before medical regulatory authorities. The broader process of complaining against a medical professional may involve different authorities depending upon the nature of the grievance and relief sought.
Ethics and Medical Registration Board
The Ethics and Medical Registration Board is one of the autonomous boards under the National Medical Commission.
Among other responsibilities, the EMRB:
- regulates professional conduct;
- promotes medical ethics;
- maintains the National Register;
- interacts with State Medical Councils; and
- hears appeals against certain disciplinary actions of State Medical Councils.
Where a State Medical Council has not been established, Section 30 also contemplates complaints and grievances concerning professional or ethical misconduct being dealt with through the EMRB in accordance with the prescribed framework.
On What Grounds Can Medical Registration Be Suspended or Cancelled?
Medical registration may be affected where professional or ethical misconduct is established.
Chapter 7 of the 2002 Ethics Regulations identifies several acts and omissions capable of constituting professional misconduct.
Importantly, Regulation 8.1 clarifies that the listed forms of misconduct are not intended to constitute an exhaustive list. Medical Councils may therefore examine other conduct that raises a genuine question of professional misconduct.
Violation of Professional Ethics
A medical practitioner who violates the professional-conduct regulations may become liable to disciplinary action.
Professional obligations extend beyond clinical treatment and include ethical behaviour, maintenance of professional standards and compliance with regulatory requirements.
Failure to Maintain Medical Records
Regulation 7.2 identifies non-maintenance of specified indoor patient records and refusal to provide them within the prescribed period when properly requested as professional misconduct.
Medical record obligations are therefore capable of producing disciplinary consequences and are not merely administrative requirements.
Failure to Display Registration Number
Failure to display the registration number in accordance with professional requirements may also constitute misconduct.
Registration details serve an important regulatory function because they help establish the identity and professional status of the practitioner.
Improper Conduct With Patients
Abuse of professional position through improper conduct with a patient can result in disciplinary action.
The doctor-patient relationship involves significant trust, and professional disciplinary rules impose ethical boundaries intended to prevent abuse of that relationship.
Breach of Patient Confidentiality
Confidential information acquired during medical treatment must ordinarily remain protected. Medical confidentiality forms an important part of professional ethics, although disclosure may be legally permitted or required in certain recognised circumstances.
Unauthorised disclosure of confidential patient information may therefore raise questions of professional misconduct in addition to other legal consequences.
Other Professional Misconduct
Other violations under the ethical framework can relate to matters such as professional behaviour, improper certification, advertising or solicitation, confidentiality, professional relationships and other unethical practices.
However, the existence of an allegation does not by itself establish misconduct. The relevant disciplinary authority must examine the facts and follow the applicable procedure.
Does Medical Negligence Automatically Lead to Cancellation of Registration?
No. Medical negligence does not automatically result in cancellation of medical registration.
Negligence and professional misconduct may sometimes overlap, but they are legally distinct concepts.
A claim of medical negligence may potentially give rise to:
- Civil liability: A patient may seek compensation where the legal requirements for negligence and resulting damage are established.
- Consumer proceedings: A medical negligence claim may, where the statutory conditions are satisfied, be brought before a Consumer Commission.
- Criminal liability: Exceptionally serious negligent conduct may have criminal consequences where the requirements of criminal law are independently satisfied.
- Professional disciplinary proceedings: The concerned medical regulatory authority may separately examine whether the practitioner’s conduct amounts to professional misconduct.
The basic legal concept of negligence requires consideration of factors such as duty of care, breach, causation and resulting damage. These principles are discussed more broadly under negligence under the law of torts.
Whether disciplinary punishment is justified depends upon the nature of the conduct and the findings made by the competent medical regulatory authority.
A simple adverse medical outcome does not, by itself, establish professional misconduct.
Similarly, filing a complaint or legal case against a medical practitioner does not automatically mean that registration must be cancelled.
How Is Professional Incompetence Determined?
Professional incompetence requires a specialised assessment.
Regulation 8.6 of the 2002 Ethics Regulations states that professional incompetence is to be judged by a peer group in accordance with the prescribed guidelines.
This is significant because questions about clinical competence often require medical expertise.
A disciplinary authority cannot properly equate every unsuccessful treatment, complication or error in judgment with professional incompetence without examining the applicable professional standard and medical circumstances.
Similarly, expert evidence in medical negligence cases becomes particularly relevant where specialised questions relating to treatment, diagnosis, medical standards or causation have to be examined.
What Is the Procedure for Suspension or Cancellation of Medical Registration?
Disciplinary action normally begins when a complaint alleging professional misconduct is brought before the appropriate Medical Council.
Regulation 8.2 provides for an enquiry into the complaint.
Complaint of Professional Misconduct
A complaint may be made before the competent Medical Council alleging conduct amounting to professional or ethical misconduct.
The complaint itself does not establish guilt. It initiates a process through which the regulatory authority examines whether disciplinary action is justified.
Enquiry by the Medical Council
The appropriate Medical Council examines the allegations and evidence.
The purpose of the enquiry is to determine whether the practitioner has actually committed misconduct warranting disciplinary punishment.
Opportunity of Hearing
The registered medical practitioner must be given an opportunity to be heard.
Regulation 8.2 expressly refers to an opportunity of being heard in person or through a pleader. Section 30 of the NMC Act also requires an opportunity of hearing before action is taken against the medical practitioner or professional concerned.
This requirement reflects procedural fairness and the broader rule that an affected person should ordinarily have a fair opportunity to respond before an adverse decision is made.
Finding of Misconduct
The disciplinary authority must determine whether professional misconduct has been established.
Punishment follows the disciplinary finding rather than merely the making of an allegation.
Imposition of Punishment
Where misconduct is established, the Council may impose an appropriate punishment.
Depending upon the circumstances, this may include removal of the doctor’s name from the register permanently or for a specified period.
Can a Doctor Be Restricted From Practice While a Complaint Is Pending?
The ethics regulations recognise a limited form of interim restriction.
Regulation 8.5 states that during the pendency of a complaint, the appropriate Council may restrain the physician from performing the particular procedure or practice that is under scrutiny.
This provision is different from a final order cancelling registration.
An interim restriction operates while the complaint is being examined, whereas final removal follows completion of the disciplinary process and a finding of misconduct.
The distinction is important because an interim restriction is intended to operate during the proceedings and should not automatically be treated as a final determination of professional guilt.
How Long Should Disciplinary Proceedings Take?
Regulation 8.4 states that a decision on a complaint against a delinquent physician should be taken within six months.
The disciplinary framework therefore contemplates reasonably prompt resolution of complaints.
Delay can affect both sides. Patients and complainants have an interest in timely determination of genuine allegations, while doctors also have an interest in avoiding indefinite disciplinary proceedings that may affect professional reputation and practice.
Can Medical Registration Be Restored After Suspension?
Yes, where removal has been imposed for a limited period.
Regulation 8.3 states that when removal from the register is ordered for a limited period, the appropriate Council may also direct restoration of the practitioner’s name after expiry of that period.
Temporary removal should therefore not automatically be treated as permanent cancellation.
The precise effect of restoration will depend upon the disciplinary order and applicable regulatory requirements.
Once the specified disciplinary period ends and restoration takes place in accordance with the order, the practitioner may again exercise the professional rights attached to valid registration, subject to applicable law.
Can a Doctor Appeal Against Suspension or Cancellation?
Yes. The National Medical Commission Act provides an appellate structure for disciplinary decisions.
Under Section 30(3), a medical practitioner or professional aggrieved by action taken by a State Medical Council may appeal to the Ethics and Medical Registration Board.
The decision of the EMRB is binding on the State Medical Council unless a further appeal is preferred.
Section 30(4) permits a person aggrieved by the decision of the EMRB to prefer an appeal to the National Medical Commission within sixty days from communication of the decision.
The broad structure is therefore:
State Medical Council → Ethics and Medical Registration Board → National Medical Commission
The availability of appeals provides an important safeguard against erroneous or disproportionate disciplinary decisions.
What Happens After a Doctor’s Name Is Removed From the Medical Register?
Removal has serious professional consequences because medical practice in India is linked to valid registration.
Section 34 of the NMC Act provides that a person who is not enrolled in the State Register or National Register cannot exercise specified rights reserved for registered medical practitioners.
Depending upon the nature and duration of the removal order, its consequences can therefore include inability to:
- Practise medicine as a registered medical practitioner: The practitioner cannot lawfully exercise professional rights that depend upon valid registration.
- Hold specified medical positions: Certain professional offices intended for registered physicians or surgeons cannot be occupied without valid registration.
- Issue specified medical certificates: The practitioner may lose the authority to sign certificates that legally require certification by a registered medical practitioner.
- Exercise other statutory professional privileges: Other functions reserved by law for registered medical practitioners may also become unavailable.
Where removal is temporary, these consequences generally correspond to the period during which registration remains removed, subject to the terms of the disciplinary order and subsequent restoration.
Is Suspension of Registration the Same as Criminal Punishment?
No.
Medical disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings serve different legal purposes.
Medical Councils primarily examine whether the practitioner has violated professional and ethical standards applicable to the medical profession.
Criminal courts determine criminal liability under applicable penal law.
The same factual incident may sometimes result in proceedings before more than one forum, but the legal questions, standards and consequences may differ.
Similarly, an allegation or criminal case against a doctor should not automatically be equated with professional guilt unless the applicable disciplinary framework independently permits and supports the action taken.
This distinction is especially important in cases involving alleged medical negligence because civil, consumer, criminal and professional consequences arise under different legal principles and must be independently established.
Why Is Natural Justice Important in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings?
Suspension or cancellation of medical registration may directly affect livelihood, professional reputation and the legal ability to practise medicine.
For this reason, procedural fairness is particularly important.
Natural justice requires fairness, impartiality and an adequate opportunity of hearing in proceedings that may adversely affect legal rights or interests.
An effective disciplinary process ordinarily requires:
- Clear allegations: The practitioner should know the substance of the allegations requiring an answer.
- Consideration by the competent authority: Proceedings must be dealt with by the regulatory body having jurisdiction under the applicable law.
- An opportunity to respond: The practitioner must receive a fair opportunity to answer the allegations and place relevant material before the authority.
- Examination of relevant evidence: Findings should be based on material relevant to the alleged professional misconduct.
- An opportunity of hearing: The affected practitioner should receive the hearing contemplated by the regulatory framework.
- An impartial decision: The disciplinary authority must approach the proceedings fairly and without improper bias.
- Reasons supporting disciplinary findings: A reasoned decision helps demonstrate how the authority reached its conclusions.
- Access to the applicable appellate mechanism: An aggrieved practitioner may use the appellate remedies provided by the NMC Act.
Section 30 of the NMC Act expressly protects the opportunity of hearing before disciplinary action, while Regulation 8.2 of the ethics regulations similarly requires an enquiry and hearing before punishment for professional misconduct.
Conclusion
Suspension and cancellation of medical registration are among the most serious regulatory measures that can be taken against a medical practitioner in India.
The National Medical Commission Act, 2019 provides the modern statutory framework, with State Medical Councils exercising disciplinary functions where empowered and the Ethics and Medical Registration Board performing important regulatory and appellate roles.
Under the presently relevant professional-conduct framework, a doctor found guilty of professional misconduct may have the name removed from the medical register either permanently or for a specified period. Temporary removal may be followed by restoration after expiry of the prescribed period, whereas permanent removal has substantially more serious consequences.
At the same time, cancellation is not the automatic consequence of every complaint, medical error or allegation of negligence. Disciplinary proceedings require examination of the alleged misconduct, observance of procedural safeguards and an opportunity of hearing. The appellate structure under the NMC Act further permits disciplinary decisions to be reviewed.
The framework therefore attempts to balance two important interests: protecting patients and maintaining ethical standards in the medical profession, while also ensuring procedural fairness before a registered medical practitioner’s right to practise is restricted or withdrawn.
Join LawBhoomi’s 100K+ Community
